CERCLA Part 1: Court Ruling Requires Livestock Operations to Report Ammonia Emissions

CERCLA part 1

Image includes large number of poultry being grown in a house.  Image of poultry by Edwin Remsberg

In this episode, Paul discusses a 2017 court ruling that will require livestock operations to report ammonia emissions under a federal law theComprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). Continue reading

Ninth Circuit’s Ruling Gives New Life to Ag Gag Laws

idaho ag gag ruling

Photo in image is by Edwin Remsberg.  Image shows dairy cattle in the pasture in Maryland.

In this episode, Paul discusses the recent Ninth Circuit Ruling that found a portion of Idaho’s ag gag law constutional, reversing a lower court decision that found the entire law unconstitutional.  This ruling may open up new opportunities for these laws if written properly. Continue reading

Top Legal Developments in 2017: A Joint Podcast with Ag Law in the Field


Top Legal Developments Pod

In this episode, Paul is joined by Tiffany Lashmet from Texas AgriLife Extension to discuss the top legal issues in agriculture for 2017.  This is a joint podcast with Ag Law in the Field. Continue reading

Recording of Identical Livestock Brands in Different Locations Violated State Branding Law

Branding law

Photo in image by Colin Brown and shows brand after applied.

In this episode, Paul discusses a recent decision out of Arizona interpreting the state’s branding law.  The Supreme Court of Arizona held that the state’s branding law did not allow for registering identical brands even if used at different locations. Continue reading

Absolute Pollution Exclusion in Insurance Policy Excludes Damage From Manure

manure as a pollutant

Photo in image by Livestock and Poultry Environmental Learning Center and shows slurry dairy manure being applied to the surface of a pasture.

In this episode, Paul discusses a recent federal district court decision that found that an insurance policy with an absolute pollution exclusion excluded damage caused by manure.  The insurance company was also found to have no duty to defend the insured party.  This decision involves the Cow Palace Dairy that had earlier settled claims that manure had leaked into groundwater and agreed to clean up costs associated with the damage.   Continue reading